Wait...so, I googled it. It's a japanese term that, near as I can tell, is same-sex-romance-fan-fiction of established manga and IP that did not otherwise have same-sex romance. So now I'm confused... 1: How is that related to the conversation, other than just throwing a tired stereotype of the LGBT community around? 2:…
hmm yeah i get what your saying and im partially agree with you. obviously a lot of games doesnt need to have lgbt characters in them, tetris for example. BUT! Very often there is already a romantic interest shoehorned into games where it isnt really relevant. cortana for example. masterchief is fighting to save the galaxy…
Like i said, Because this whole thread it's pointless :) and because i think this a thread that should not be on these forums. do i need to be more clear? :) eld, that's your point of view, and i'm sure you are making too many assumptions :P Persona 4 has LGBT content? gay or lesbian love? seriously? that's a surprise (I'm…
Dude...When you bring up niche sexual fetishes...the LGBT community has *nothing* on some of the bizarre shit out there. Come on man! Have you seen this thing we call the internet?!? LGBT isn't even a 'niche'--it's an identity quality, not a lifestyle choice. Let's play a little with your example, using a classic niche…
Kinda how I'm seeing it too. Shoehorning "diverse" characters into something just for the sake of having them there is hackneyed crap. You include those aspects if A) they're even relevant, and B) more importantly, they work within the overall piece. Including something just to say it was in there when it doesn't really…
Blaizer made one sort of valid point though. Go out and make stuff. You, WE are the ones that make games. This is not us complaining about books or chairs or TV or plush toys. This is us complaining about our own products. No, we don't have absolute control, and no we cannot (realistically) force upper management to change…