If you could currently be replaced by an anonymous outsource artist then yes, the robot will take your job and it'll probably happen in the next couple of years. In practice I strongly doubt that anyone currently employed will be directly replaced by a robot . Instead what will probably happen is that studios will rely…
"That's my two cents anyway. Hope it helps weight the fear/bias towards a more nuanced look at AI from artists. For anyone feeling worry/anxiety about the industry... learn the fundamentals and wait for the platforms/tools to shift. It's going to be okay. Your future is probably fine" I don't think that's the case at all,…
If your only argument about AI is always it's not illegal that mean even you understand the ethical aspect of it and that also mean that it should probably be ... Also MJ watermark their image ( invisible one) so they don't train it back on itself, they know that if they start training on their own result they will only…
The first and foremost would be making sure how its sourcing its inputs. Why? There is no law that forbids to look at images and to analyze them. This is what artists does since art exists.
Since this technology is projected to wipe out jobs that tend to generate significant tax income (e.g. I read that plenty of middle management positions might well be on the cutting block within a few years time) I'm pretty sure the law will catch up with them. Lobbying - in my opinion - only goes so far if the very bottom…
Three words you will never see in the future: "Respected AI Artist". History of course will respect the great artists of the past. But in the future the respect will be reserved for the ones who created the AI, not the ones who pay a monthly fee to use it. It has basically granted everyone with super powers. And spare me…
@Tiles I get that you like AI, but every single one of your posts in this thread are just you saying "false claim" without giving a good reason why it's a false claim, and ignoring all the thoughtful stuff between the "false claims". This WHOLE thread basically amounts to: AI uses art made by artists to build its database;…
@iam717 Hm, as I see it, the person promotes their original reference packs in a blog post, by showing artworks from others that made use of their packs. Maybe they have permission by the artists? Briefly looking at some of the packs, doesn't look to me like artworks from others were re-packaged or consist of AI-generated…
"or learn to use AI as far as is practical to make yourself more competitive in the rat race" That's a deeply flawed line of reasoning though - no one is becoming more competitive by "learning to use AI". If anything that's probably the most counter-productive thing an artist can do. "... first they come off as elitist and…