I guess it stands to reason that how many of these users would have potentially commissioned an artist to create art for them in the first place. I really do see this as a fad that will go the way for NFT's, oversaturation followed by rollback and liquidation. I mean people that are artistic will likely use AI to create…
Geez :/ I wanted to stop discussing here since it became a bit too heated for my flavour. But this fake news here draws me back in. I am pretty sure that this image was created to provoke this "theft" look by using the image to image method. And not by letting it create by AI from scratch. Image to Image allows you to…
Three words you will never see in the future: "Respected AI Artist". History of course will respect the great artists of the past. But in the future the respect will be reserved for the ones who created the AI, not the ones who pay a monthly fee to use it. It has basically granted everyone with super powers. And spare me…
I must say I am genuinely fascinated by the fact that some don't seem to see the issue of "just using it for inspiration" (or moodboards). I mean, HELLO ? Not only is it a slippery slope as mentionned above, but it is also *litterally pointless*. The point of a moodboard is not just to gather pretty shiny pictures to show…
I think the one advantage human artists will retain is the ability to leverage shape language, which is the seed of novelty in design. Not that AI can't comprehend it, but it's intangible enough that training for it will be difficult and integrating it into a prompt is nearly impossible. I don't see us getting any iconic…
@Tiles But we've already shown examples of pixel-per-pixel (more or less) copies of prominent images, in one of the other AI threads. Yes, you can make content that looks similar. The more famous an image is, the closer AI will come to it. But it is not pixel by pixel. And you can do similar images with Photoshop or Krita…
I This has already been highlighted by both Pior and Neox, but just because something is legal now does not mean that makes it right, nor that it will be legal forever. Laws change and update all the time together with new inventions and with society. There will most likely be many things regarding AI that we need to iron…
Right, why commission an artist? In fact, why not accept commissions in their stead? When a market is saturated it loses its value and profitability. People who are artistic actually don't need to use the software to make something meaningful. In fact, creating art is a form of meditation, it's how they become artistic and…
@tiles we already have something that make it potentially illegal it's called copyright ... the problem behind the AI is the inputed copyrighted stuff into it, their creator used them without having the right to do so which should be illegal and don't respond me with it's not the same pixel again ... they used copyrighted…
As you can see, Shutterstock and Nvidia are going to collaborate to create an artificial intelligence that can generate 3D models from text. This is an innovation that could facilitate the creation and customization of visual content for different industries and applications. According to Shutterstock, the AI-generated…