all the law is threat of violence, and almost exclusively it is used to protect the owning class, not the working class. Wow. Just wow. I have stopped reading at that point already. Whatever you say my friend, whatever you say. And we don't have AI for music yet, right? Of course we have, since eons. Also here no lawsuit…
the future is almost certainly death of the entire human race and nearly all other forms of life, so it kinda needs to be stopped. True. But i prefer to have nevertheless some fun before this happens :) it's not good at all for people who made a living by making art. And people who makes a living from art explicitely…
Indeed, an informative articulately written piece. There are a lot of trade-offs, and no easy answers. Artists and creators will be harmed economically, and it’s nearly certain that industries will be disrupted or even destroyed, although perhaps it’s too early to say which ones and how soon. It’s possible that the…
I still can not understand the reason why somebody would call it AI "art" in the first place other than for cynical manipulation of social narratives. For sociopaths everything can be a "tool", even another person. No wonder they are so loud right now in defending AI with rather very weak arguments, e.g. that it is fun for…
100% i am so glad you can see that, i am against it all the way but people are actually saying the genie's out of the bottle and we have to "conform" cause its out there... if the "world" decides its fine then they go ahead its better than having nothing, cause its okay to steal apparently. I rather this was never around…
I still don't get the point of all this. I mean great if the guy gets an ego boost and some followers, besides posters and tshirts and maybe magnets, what other way is there to monetise this. And if he gets a commission besides prompting to generate something random, what does his time cost? Like I'd through a cent for the…
I This has already been highlighted by both Pior and Neox, but just because something is legal now does not mean that makes it right, nor that it will be legal forever. Laws change and update all the time together with new inventions and with society. There will most likely be many things regarding AI that we need to iron…
Right, why commission an artist? In fact, why not accept commissions in their stead? When a market is saturated it loses its value and profitability. People who are artistic actually don't need to use the software to make something meaningful. In fact, creating art is a form of meditation, it's how they become artistic and…
The laion dataset usage copyright is for research and learning. It wasn't supposed to be used to train AI for commercial purposes since that infringes on individual copyrights. The thing is when the lawsuits start this is likely the angle it will take and if it holds up it will require stability AI, Midjourney and Dall-E…
@tiles we already have something that make it potentially illegal it's called copyright ... the problem behind the AI is the inputed copyrighted stuff into it, their creator used them without having the right to do so which should be illegal and don't respond me with it's not the same pixel again ... they used copyrighted…