on the first point your still wrong, its bad advice. the fact that you would post about 3 pages of nonsense trying to defend it instead of just admitting your wrong like most people would speaks volumes about your ability to admit mistakes. on the second point we have some solid facts now. awesome... i like facts. first…
The only one that has a problem here is you. Its one thing for you to make your argument (which I support when non aggressive) as to why you think Mudbox is the best option, but its another thing altogether for you to try and beat others down with condescending comments. You also seem to have a severe confirmation bias.…
I dont disagree with that, and I have never said otherwise. I am at my core a maya-zbrush user, but not everyone has the funds to license both. The problem is when people jump ahead and try to assume recommending X software is bad because no one uses it in the industry... and that is just simply flawed logic and actually…
@Dataday i am not going to quote your last post because you did not make any new points to refute the two issues which i pointed out. you just seem to be angry that someone would challenge you and explain why certain assertions are false and certain advice is bad. who is kicking the bees nest here? if you want to make…
Because you didnt offer any counter point. All you said was something along the lines of "I dont believe you, you are full of "fud"". Feel free to re-establish your counter argument without all the immature condescending comments. If you can manage to do that in a mature manner, I will address whatever points you think you…