I honestly don't think most employers will care. They'll just accept whatever the AI gives and try to modify it a little, then stick with that. They'll attempt to use human hands as little as possible and for the instances they do, because less skill and work in general is needed from a person, it opens the position up for…
I totally agree that the data created from training should be considered exactly the same as directly copying images and applying a filter to them in photoshop. You are still deriving a product from the original work, doesn't matter how convoluted the process is. The fair use doctrine needs to be updated to account for…
@Tiles Okay. Noting this is a game art forum, I think it's safe to assume a large majority of the members in the discussion here understand that Photoshop, Maya, Zbrush, etc. are graphics software. I think what's central to the topic is the impact of AI's standout feature of rapidly converting text prompts into images.
Three words you will never see in the future: "Respected AI Artist". History of course will respect the great artists of the past. But in the future the respect will be reserved for the ones who created the AI, not the ones who pay a monthly fee to use it. It has basically granted everyone with super powers. And spare me…
"Now enter the AI which can do digital art. Its doing the same thing as the average digital artist, which is to just produce mindless art which it can do much faster and often better. That drops digital arts value to a rock IMO." This last point is so very true IMHO - and that's probably the saddest part about the whole AI…
Sure that will get rid of the people who can't actually draw anything and are now busy googling basic Photoshop tutorials. But what about those who are half-decent (but below the threshold for talent you'd seek out) and use AI and as such the work of others to boost their own output? Seems like it would be possible to feed…
@Tiles But we've already shown examples of pixel-per-pixel (more or less) copies of prominent images, in one of the other AI threads. Yes, you can make content that looks similar. The more famous an image is, the closer AI will come to it. But it is not pixel by pixel. And you can do similar images with Photoshop or Krita…
Lol the above example of art theft is especially interesting because it doesn't even require for the art on the left to be part of the training set - AI Bro basically did the equivalent of a photoshop paintover and claimed it his own. This is basically the most childish behavior possible. It's not even cynical, it's just…
This does not work. Since you can train the AI with these images anyways. And the dataset is free available content of the internet. Nobody would ever think of limiting Photoshop to draw just vertical lines. Why do you want to do this with AI? It always boils down that you want to regulate the tool and all its users…
I did notice some AI art users looking to learn photoshop after using AI (likely to clean those funky hands) so in a way its motivating people to learn. The issue is only when large companies start using it, though I don't see what use case they would have for art generated this way. So far the use cases I'm seeing is…