We go in circles. Since of course i disagree. Copyright is not broken by looking at public available images. Oh boy would we have a problem when this would be the case :) Have a read here: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/23/technology/copilot-microsoft-ai-lawsuit.html To the surprise of many legal experts, Mr. Butterick’s…
This is hardly a good comparison. The decent thing to do is to credit the asset maker, list what you used and most importantly, pay for the asset. Just like you paid for all the software in your pipeline. The artist also makes a choice of the assets to purchase. Amongst numerous other decisions, scene layout, converting…
Let's for a moment assume that is the case. And court follows your argumentation and all your fantasies comes true. Stable Diffusion allows training with own material already. And has already kicked quite a few name prompts out of their weight. You cannot longer type in a name of an artist from artstation. It will not work…
The longer its a free for all the higher the damages would be. Logically it would be sensible for all Ai generators to stop using the data sets of limit their prompt usage and allow artists to opt out so any litigation will focus on the relevance of older models and damages that they would incur to copyright holders.…
I guess it stands to reason that how many of these users would have potentially commissioned an artist to create art for them in the first place. I really do see this as a fad that will go the way for NFT's, oversaturation followed by rollback and liquidation. I mean people that are artistic will likely use AI to create…
Our society has long decided that it is no dilemma. We use robots, we use computers, we use cars instead of horses. We use everything that makes our life easier. This concerns me. Machine Learning and AI has been on the mainstream for the better part of a decade now, and I am yet to see really serious improvements to our…
People who had been winning by merit of their own hard won skills now become the losers Why? What does these people stop to use AI too? And to repeat it again, it's not that you can let your cleaning woman do the job now. It's the opposite, you need even more knowledge about art than before. You cannot simply start to…
Well, for me it is simply a tool like Photoshop :) You still underestimate the effort to create something really good looking with AI. It is not enough to type in a few words. You still, and even more than in traditional art, need the artistic skills and knowledge to steer the AI where you want it to be. Else it will go…
No, they did not understand. They jumped too short and saw just their own feet. That's why. And most of them ended in jail. Some got even deported to australia. So technology got us where we are. People are getting spoiled and bored out of their mind, living for instant gratification, lip-sync quotes from movies pretending…