Ah i see. I never said it is a substitute for Photoshop. Just that it is a graphics software, like photoshop. Of course there are differences. Like there are differences between Max, ZBrush, Substances and Photoshop too. But you can also use AI to manipulate images, not just to create it. And you can use Photoshop to…
Well, considering that the example promts consists of things like this … … it seems pretty clear to me that this is using the same kind of artist-fucking, image-stealing, compensation-dodging tech that powers all other AI image generators. Make of that what you will.
From a technical point of view it is amazing, the results however give me the creeps, even more than still images. Especially when humans are involved this feels like a new level of uncanny valley, too many things are just off.
I've been seeing this sort of thing a lot; person shares objectively cool image, gets a compliment, doesn't mention it was AI. A lot of "I made" "I did" "my" language. In a 3d software you can load some premade assets and click a button to render the image. Did you now create and render the image? Or was it the software?…
why is cara any different than artstation or deviant art or anything else? If I can right click and save an image, surely the geniuses can still scrape it, right? I bet somebody has a good answer, but I also bet that after some time it will come out that cara (or anything on the internet claiming to be some sort of safe…
@ModBlue The majority of human art has always been generic or of low quality. The problem is that AI images can be generated in seconds and have high quality (colors, composition etc). Arguably much higher quality than those mediocre human artworks. As such they trend on Pinterest etc, while those human artworks did not.…
The "cat is out of the bag" position is IMHO a rather short-sighted and somewhat unimaginative admission of defeat in regards to the way current models are using data from non-public domain images, without obtaining any license from the artists who got scraped. What license should this be? Don't stare at me CC 2.0 ? ^^ I…
Geez :/ I wanted to stop discussing here since it became a bit too heated for my flavour. But this fake news here draws me back in. I am pretty sure that this image was created to provoke this "theft" look by using the image to image method. And not by letting it create by AI from scratch. Image to Image allows you to…
Between one image and the other, some nuances are lost, I suppose the software will improve over time but it's also nothing that can't be assumed in many portfolios. Besides Nightshade, there are other software options that I haven't tried yet. When I have enough time to analyze them thoroughly, I will experiment with…