might be because it seems like the pro AI people lack conviction and good arguments. i've spent a total of maybe a few hours reading on the subject and have pretty much no dogs in the fight, shouldnt be difficult to prove me wrong on anything. In fact half of the common AI bro arguments i even agree with. It is the same as…
I read the transcript, not seeing what this indicates? or how it refutes points made in previous video from the youtube artist. the AI takes an input image (in many cases, a copyrighted image which cannot be reused for commercial purposes without permission). Then it transmogrifies the image and does various other things.…
Fair point, have you got any examples of where you can point this plagiarism out? I would like to see what this looks like and how different it is from the original, particularly with concept art. I am like a moth to a flame with this tech, while I don't like the lack of consent and acknowledgement to the original artist…
Kinda surprised this thread didn't get bumped with the release of Corridor Digital's Anime Rock Paper Scissors First, I think it's a cool proof of concept and a good demo of where the tech is right now. And the response has been very divisive. People saying they should be sued into bankruptcy, they have no ethics, that…
it's stealing their style This part is not copyrighted. And most probably never will. And so it is not stealing. Like you cannot patent a game idea neither.
I am not sure what your point is. Since copyright is especially the part that is not touched by the AI solutions. Yes you can produce copyrighted material with it, like with Photoshop. No, it does not use or produce copyrighted material by design, like Photoshop. It is a tool to create graphics. And that's not my opinion…