Well yes, that's what happens every time we invent new things. Unfortunately what also happens every time is that legislation lags behind a bit and people get screwed over until it catches up. (music sampling in the 1980s is probably a decent parallel to draw) There are a lot of noisy idiots jumping on the 'robot bad'…
Sure that will get rid of the people who can't actually draw anything and are now busy googling basic Photoshop tutorials. But what about those who are half-decent (but below the threshold for talent you'd seek out) and use AI and as such the work of others to boost their own output? Seems like it would be possible to feed…
Yes i know, since the very most are not willing to accept the truth. Claiming that AI is stealing to discredit the competitor is so much simpler. Well, maybe we simply have reached the end of the discussion. You will never convince me from your point of view since i know what AI does and is and how it works. And i have…
This does not work. Since you can train the AI with these images anyways. And the dataset is free available content of the internet. Nobody would ever think of limiting Photoshop to draw just vertical lines. Why do you want to do this with AI? It always boils down that you want to regulate the tool and all its users…
Sure it can. But for what reason? And what exactly do you want to put under punishment? Looking at public available images? Painting in the style of a living artist? That's all things that human artists does too. Imho the real reason why AI is hated is because it is a competitor for traditional artists. And because of hurt…
I do wonder what they would do if a legal precedent hits, what would happen to previous training models, would work derived from them be included in a repository that future AI models can derive from. Usually when it's this complicated, it comes down to a settlement and some conditions. I feel like the conditions would be…
I'd not worry about it really. 3D looks to be one of the safer fields and probably one that can benefit from AI given it is growing in various areas (i.e. metaverse, VR, 3D printing). I've seen some people outright panic over the AI and its like....we don't even know how the AI is going to affect things when it comes to…
Those jobs which are necessary for people to live are grueling and menial... but making stupid entertainment that is designed to funnel money from adults through their ignorant children are life affirming? I mean maybe for you it has been great but there is more to the world than your emotions, isn't there? But set that…
What about all the stuff that is prohibitively expensive to make right now but could be doable in the future with AI? We might see new avenues of creativity pop up that just weren't feasible before. An example would be how epic sci-fi movies are usually made by giant teams in large studios. Same goes for most hand drawn…
What false claim ? THIS false claim. You input (and i talk about input, Image to Image is a feature where you can load an image for further manipulation) a copyrighted image and claim the AI to break the copyright. Seriously? What lie comes next? And the false claim of broken copyright. And the false claim of broken law.…