Home General Discussion

Crysis 3 - 'Maxing out' current gen consoles

polycounter lvl 12
Offline / Send Message
Baron Flame polycounter lvl 12
I was just catching up on my gaming news when I saw this rather interesting article posted on gamespot.

http://www.gamespot.com/news/crytek-crysis-3-is-maxing-out-current-gen-6401405

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mb4H40Vatrs&feature=g-high-u"]GS News - Crytek: Crysis 3 maxes out current gen consoles - YouTube[/ame]

Now I've been a Crysis fan ever since it came out. I still remember that when the Crysis came out it took everyone and everything by storm. It made rigs cry(at least mine did) for quite some time. So naturally when I heard first heard about Crysis 3 and saw the trailers when they came out I was hoping for something similar but I never thought that it would actually max out the current gen consoles. To go so far as to say that
There is absolutely not even 1 percent left. No game will ever look technically better than Crysis 3 on these consoles, flat out.
is quite something.

What further interested me was his claim that the Halo and/or Gears of War franchises do not even come close to what they have achieved with Crysis 3.(I would love to see it go head to head with BF3 though.)

Honestly I can't wait to get myself the new rig/workstation I've been saving up for, for the last couple of months and get my hands on this game.

Any thoughts guys?

P.s :
"With Crysis 3, we're pushing that to another level, but the PC is just two levels beyond."
\m/

Replies

  • wasker
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    wasker polycounter lvl 7
    Well, I dunno sounds a bit like sales talk to me. I'm sure it's going to be a fantastic looking game in any case but there are other titles out there that do some pretty crazy tech stuff too.
    Anyways, even the first games that were released on the current console generation maxed them out in terms of raw performance, we've just found new ways to fake it or less memory/cpu intensive ways of doing things ever since.
  • Snader
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    Snader polycounter lvl 15
    HYPE HYPE HYPE BRAHHHHH! U PSYKED YETTTTTTT????

    Given that people nowadays are still managing to push the Commodore 64 to newer and further limits, it is highly unlikely that the PS3 is done doing things yet. That said, it IS becoming financially unwise to push it, because it's probably better to aim at PC's and next-gen consoles with enhanced graphics, because there's a learning curve there but much more gains to be found (soon).

    And like they said, they're pushing lots of data - but that doesn't mean that it looks the best visually. Personally, I much prefer the looks of Journey and I am sure that 5 years down the line it will hold up better than Crysis 3 graphics. Just like Ocarina of Time vs Goldeneye.
  • WarrenM
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    Yeah, AFAIK consoles have been maxed out for years. Each year graphics programmers come up with new techniques which win back a few ms per frame, which then get consumed with new effects. And the cycle repeats...
  • Snefer
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    Snefer polycounter lvl 16
    Saying that there is only 1% left doesnt really mean anything, you can max out a high-end PC with minesweeper if you program it shitty enough. That being said, I agree with that they are pushing alot of more tech than probably any other multiplatform engine, even if the framerate in Crysis 2 was more like 10-25 than a steady 30. ^^ Crysis 3 looks godlike though, but im expecting the same kind of performance on console, too highend for those old boxes. ^^

    Snader, you might want to read the article, hehe:

    "I'm not talking about art style--art is subjective--but the pure fact of what we have been cramming in with Crysis 2 on Xbox [360] and PlayStation [3], I've yet to see a game do that still today.""
  • ZacD
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    ZacD ngon master
    To be honest Cry Engine has a lot of amazing stuff you don't see in Gears of War and Halo, mostly its deferred rendering, fancy lights, and destructibility. But those also require a lot of sacrifices like agressive object popping. But deffered lighting and other features aren't anything new or unique. I'd argue Rage's MegaTexture is more technically impressive. Mostly just hype talk, which is fine. The speaker could of read it better though.
  • Andreas
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    Andreas polycounter lvl 11
    Yep this is standard marketing. Even Far Cry is pushing the current gen to the max tbh.

    Not even 1% lol.

    'HEY GUYS WE FOUND ANOTHER %!!'

    'AWESOME SOMEONE CALL GAMESPOT!!' :D
  • ZacD
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    ZacD ngon master
    Far Cry 3's Dunia Engine is based on the CryEngine but is heavily modified.
  • MainManiac
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    MainManiac polycounter lvl 11
    Still 22-25 fps upscaled crap, will look good on PC for sure.

    Will spawn RROD's on xbox's though. If you don't keep your xbox in an open spot this game will ruin it.

    Either way consoles have been maxed out forever. Every year engines just get optimized more and then they cram more stuff in.

    As to Crysis the second one ruined the series for me.
  • Blaizer
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    Blaizer interpolator
    I only hope to see a true crysis 3 for PC, and not a stupid port from console like crysis 2.

    This is just marketing with nice words without content.
  • Andreas
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    Andreas polycounter lvl 11
    I only hope to see C3 on steam :P Let modders fix the rest.
  • leilei
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    leilei polycounter lvl 14
    ZacD wrote: »
    Far Cry 3's Dunia Engine is based on the CryEngine but is heavily modified.

    You sure? FarCry 2 (Which FC3 is technically derived upon) didn't feel like any CryEngine at all.
  • Fuse
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    Fuse polycounter lvl 18
    I heard it was based on the Unreal 3 technology as a lot of proprietary Ubisoft technology is.
  • Snader
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    Snader polycounter lvl 15
    Wiki says it's Cry tech, not Epic.
    wikipedia wrote:
    It is based on the CryEngine but was heavily modified by the Ubisoft Montreal development team for use in Far Cry 2

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunia_Engine

    Also, the games are called Far Cry and Crysis for a reason, I think.
  • Ark
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    Ark polycounter lvl 11
    Yeah Dunia is based off Cryengine 1 and their LEAD engine that's used in the Splinter Cell games is based off Unreal 2.5.
  • Baron Flame
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    Baron Flame polycounter lvl 12
    Lots of good points being made here.
    @Snader
    Lmfao!
    I am psyched out now!!
    But like Snefer pointed out, what you are getting at, might be the art style. I haven't played Journey but from what it seems like is that the reason for that games success likes in the simplicity of it's gameplay and it's visual style. I can see as to why it will outlast other games(again it may be just my perception of things).

    As far as this being just a marketing strategy is concerned, well it most likely is one. The only thing being that I've never ever heard(or remember it for that matter, shoddy morning sleep deprived memory you see ) of a developer specifically naming out games their game will be better than.

    @Blaizer, Frell
    I agree. Crysis 2 was a let down but hopefully it won't be the same case this time. Back when I heard about them changing the environment to an urban one, I had automatically lowered my expectations significantly, maybe that's the reason why the second one didn't completely ruin it for me.
    That being said, this time around with this article and statement out, not to mention the trailers/other videos that've been up for some time now, expectation will be/already are very high and so far it does look rather promising.
  • Ark
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    Ark polycounter lvl 11
    I wouldn't say Crysis 2 was a port, maybe the consoles forced the game to be more linear and enclosed, hopefully Crysis 3 is a mix between both games as i enjoyed them both.
  • ambershee
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    ambershee polycounter lvl 17
    Crytek need to stop letting Yerli out in public; he opens his mouth and bullshit just falls right out of it every time. If it isn't this, it's the crap he's pushing as an excuse to go free to play, or the utter bollocks he peddled as an excuse to move to consoles that no one bought either.
  • AlexCatMasterSupreme
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    AlexCatMasterSupreme interpolator
    It is though...
  • Alberto Rdrgz
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    Alberto Rdrgz polycounter lvl 9
    It sounds like they have a good marketing team... :)
  • pior
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    pior grand marshal polycounter
    This was pretty much the most embarrassing sales quote ever, kinda sad to hear actually.

    Certainly not "maxed out" considering that it will, at the very best, run at 30 fps. Following this logic, any game running smoother than Crysis3 is just not sluggish enough? Or, such games magically found some hidden %s left over that Crysis3 didnt use ?

    Unless of course Crysis3 is running at a solid 60fps on consoles like Rage and CoD do. But I doubt it since no such claim has been made anywhere.

    Also I am the only one to think that that the "two levels beyond" bit doesn't make much sense ... as an english sentence ? Does that mean that the PC version is even harder to run, and that it is somehow a good thing ? Or maybe he meant that the PC version has waaay more graphics features than the console versions, which then totally contradicts what he said about those versions being so great.
  • Ace-Angel
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    Ace-Angel polycounter lvl 12
    If you read between the lines, you can the see the following text:

    "We're pretty much pulling all the tricks in the books to get the game running, so there will be alot of sluggish moments as we barely scrape 30fps on the console, hence our boasting statement of all out on that".

    Which is nothing to be ashamed of, since all games on consoles nowadays are WAAAAY past their prime.

    "Also, we decided to use ndo2 and ddo this time to make a few different maps for our shaders quickly, and they will come with the game instead of a patch for PC gamers, so they will feel like we're making good use of the next-gen DX11 stuff".

    Although reading the article, I kinda find it in poor taste on how they're passive-aggressively hitting on other competing games and their tech from other companies. What's the point in that honestly? First the writer of Cry2 and now this.

    I'm more interested to know if Yerli's statement will hold true for the MP section of the game, since last I recall, there was some hum-bug speak that graphically the MP portions of the game were gimped for smoother experiences across the board. If that ends up being true also in this case (outside of the PC), then it kinda puts you back in the hotseat again, doesn't it, especially since Halo and Gears already do that all across the board.
  • ambershee
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    ambershee polycounter lvl 17
    I've played Crysis 3 multiplayer in whatever iteration is was at in September, and I can confirm that it was not visually very impressive (and the gameplay was an embellished CoD clone, of course).

    I'm interested to see what they manage to do with console hardware.
  • vargatom
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    The hardware utilization percentages are totally meaningless...

    theoretically, you could measure how many CPU and GPU cycles are spent working without stalling, how much of the clock cycles of the internal and external buses are used for data transfer, how much memory is left free and so on. We all know it's impossible to reach 100% efficiency here from the start.

    Also, unless you're on rails in the game the whole time, the content it has to work with changes all the time. Sometimes you're in a simple room, or fighting just one enemy, but at other times you need to display huge vistas and run AI for a bunch of enemies and calculate physics for explosions and stuff. If you're stressing the system to the max in the room / 1 enemy scenario already then your framerate would drop to rock bottom when the complexity is increased. So you need to run at 60-70% utilization most of the time to leave some room for more stressing situations.
    Which means that you actually want to avoid 100% utilization - because that means you're not hitting your target frame rate most of the time.

    And finally, just because you're using a lot of CPU cycles and memory and all, it does not mean that your engine is doing meaningful stuff. One could run 100% utilization just drawing a white rectangle on the screen, theoretically. Even in practice, a game not utilizing all the resources could still look and play and sound better than one that's absolutely maxing everything out at a rock solid 30 or 60 fps.

    So this is really truly just useless marketing talk...
  • ambershee
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    ambershee polycounter lvl 17
    Yup. It's Yerli. He just talks whatever rubbish suits him at the time regardless of the reality.

    My favourite Yerli examples are how he justifies changes in his business:

    What EA said about Crysis Release:
    Our co-publishing and distribution business delivered big. Revenue in the quarter was $372 million ex deferral, up more than seven times that of last year. Rockband, Orange Box and Crysis all exceeded expectations.

    EA confirmed Crysis had sold over 1 million units in the two months it had been available in the same transcript.

    Source (requires registration): http://seekingalpha.com/article/62617-electronic-arts-f3q08-qtr-end-12-31-07-earnings-call-transcript

    What Yerli said about Crysis Release: (3 months after the above)
    To the degree PC Gamers that pirate games inherently destroy the platform. Similar games on consoles sell factors of 4-5 more. It was a big lesson for us and I believe we wont have PC exclusives as we did with Crysis in future. We are going to support PC, but not exclusive anymore.

    Source: http://www.pcplay.hr/modules.php?r=23&id=15

    What Yerli actually Meant:
    I want to support consoles in future because it will be more profitable to us both as a game and as licensing our engine tech. Instead of just saying this outright, I'm going to scream "PIRACY!!1", blame poor sales and alienate all those people who actually paid money to buy my game.

    One year later: what Crysis actually sold

    3 million copies. 1.5 million expansions. Total tune of 4.5 million units shipped at a development cost in the region of $31 million. Metacritic 91.

    source: http://www.zuse.hessen.de/mm/Konrad_Zuse_Kongress_Yerli_Final.pdf

    What Yerli said about it at the time
    Well, commercially, we had hopes that were not met. But the real expectations were actually met. As a developer we made a profit, so we're happy. Critically, we achieved goals. The [reviews] were slightly under the critique-level that we wanted to have, but that's life.

    Source: http://uk.ign.com/articles/2008/06/26/cevat-yerli-qa
    What Yerli actually meant:

    I don't live on the same planet as everyone else and can't accept that my critically acclaimed, best-selling game isn't absolutely perfect in everyone's eyes.

    What EA said about Crysis 2:
    Crysis 2® sold in approximately three million units
    It got a metacritic of around 85 and has probably sold in the region of 4-5 million overall across all platforms.

    What Yerli said about Crysis 2:
    I'm not talking about being greedy and we want more sales. But effectively Crysis 1 and 2 and 3 are just about breaking even.

    Source: http://www.mcvuk.com//news/read/crysis-struggles-to-break-even-as-dev-ponders-free-to-play-switch/0106285

    My thoughts:
    The series has sold ~10 million units to date - and the first game is one of the best selling PC games of all time. If that's not profitable, you need to reconsider your approach of development, not business. I also suspect the 'not profitable' line is simply a bare-faced lie.
  • IchII3D
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    IchII3D polycounter lvl 12
    When Crysis first released its first month sales where a flop, but unlike a lot of games it sold well over a long period of time. This is why you get so many conflicting reports.

    http://www.pcworld.com/article/140623/article.html

    In terms of Crysis 3 'maxing out' current gen I'm fairly confident it has, not in comparison to others. But if we spent 1-2 years more I honestly don't think we would gain much more than 1ms. Remember we aren't talking about art here but simply tech. There are plenty of games out there with fantastic tech, Halo and Uncharted stand out. But Crysis is multiplatform and I would be hard pressed to think of a multiplatform title that has comparable tech.
  • Visceral
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    Wow i would take 60fps above graphical fidelity ANY DAY
  • ambershee
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    ambershee polycounter lvl 17
    IchII3D wrote: »
    When Crysis first released its first month sales where a flop, but unlike a lot of games it sold well over a long period of time. This is why you get so many conflicting reports.

    That's why they're in chronological order, and first hand. The first two weeks were poor, but the first two months were not.
  • vargatom
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    I dunno, I thought Battlefield 3 is quite advanced in tech, and to me the trailers looked better than Crysis, artistically. Then again I haven't seen it run on consoles so I don't know how it actually ended up looking.

    But I did see the airplane mission video on youtube and it was amazing...
  • Ark
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    Ark polycounter lvl 11
    IchII3D wrote: »
    When Crysis first released its first month sales where a flop, but unlike a lot of games it sold well over a long period of time. This is why you get so many conflicting reports.

    http://www.pcworld.com/article/140623/article.html

    In terms of Crysis 3 'maxing out' current gen I'm fairly confident it has, not in comparison to others. But if we spent 1-2 years more I honestly don't think we would gain much more than 1ms. Remember we aren't talking about art here but simply tech. There are plenty of games out there with fantastic tech, Halo and Uncharted stand out. But Crysis is multiplatform and I would be hard pressed to think of a multiplatform title that has comparable tech.

    PC Games have always sold like this, over longer periods of time, as opposed to mass sales at release.
  • Baron Flame
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    Baron Flame polycounter lvl 12
    Reading the above comments, I did learn a lot and the more I learn, the more it seems marketing to me as well.

    Ace-Angel wrote: »
    Although reading the article, I kinda find it in poor taste on how they're passive-aggressively hitting on other competing games and their tech from other companies. What's the point in that honestly? First the writer of Cry2 and now this.

    ^This. I feel the same way about it. Developers shouldn't really compare their tech or games with those of other companies, it's simply projects a juvenile image(or maybe it's just me). He could've simply said that Crysis 3 would be miles(Eh?) ahead of the first and the second game and that would've been enough to get the point across.
    pior wrote: »
    Also I am the only one to think that that the "two levels beyond" bit doesn't make much sense ... as an english sentence ? Does that mean that the PC version is even harder to run, and that it is somehow a good thing ? Or maybe he meant that the PC version has waaay more graphics features than the console versions, which then totally contradicts what he said about those versions being so great.


    I like to think that this part is simply about a PC's graphical superiority over the current gen consoles and how it is harder to 'max' them out as compared to the consoles. Makes you kinda wonder if his statement is relative in nature meaning that they have done what they can for the console versions making it 'better'' than the games he has stated(since GOW(except the first game) and Halo(Went exclusive after the 2nd game didn't it?) being exclusive to console) but since the PC is graphically superior, they haven't exactly been able to do the same with it.
    vargatom wrote: »
    I dunno, I thought Battlefield 3 is quite advanced in tech, and to me the trailers looked better than Crysis, artistically. Then again I haven't seen it run on consoles so I don't know how it actually ended up looking.

    But I did see the airplane mission video on youtube and it was amazing...

    Hence the reason why I want to see it go head to head with BF3. I've read about gamers with GTX 680's complain about the framerate, specially in an area with a lot explosions. Some blame it on bad coding, some just say it's just one of those games and others say something else. I wonder why he didn't name BF3 with GOW and Halo. :P

    But I dunno, I am posting this in a rather sleepy state. xD
Sign In or Register to comment.