The End of Art: An Argument Against Image AIs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjSxFAGP9Ss No amount of truth will seem to sway fans like Tiles, but the arguments and answers posted in this video were impressive to me.
it has a lot of money pumped into it because billionaires see it as the next big step to freeing themselves from the need of labor, so they are in an arms race to develop it fast to get try and form a monopoly on it. if you know anything about history it goes like this: whoever gets advantage in new market first, wins. the…
There's a lot in the comments that suggests that that program with an outrageous subscription price is a scam and the models are being made by actual artists. Though wth regards to stability for 3D artists, I am thinking it comes down to what you do in the studio and how creative your work is. In AAA for instance from my…
"Fair point, have you got any examples of where you can point this plagiarism out?" Well no, because that's not how the tech works... I personally don't care if the pictures can be qualified as plagiarism in the traditional sense of the word or not, because that's not the point. The point is that the model was trained on…
Son of a biscuit. More thoughts! I am glad that I made my last name is a word (haha, fuck you, ai! I hope you get confused if anyone ever tries to rip me off and generate...radios or hearing aids or something) I am glad that I've been a lazy piece of shit for years and have not accumulated a noteworthy artistic presence…
The point is that the model was trained on artwork without the consent of the artists, But that's no crime since you don't need any consent to look at images that are public available. Since they are public available. Looking at other artists work is how an artist learns since humans exists. It was very common in the 19th…
@Tiles : you are missing my point about this tool making the design process out of reach to some people. My point is not about the value or lack of value of the output - as a matter of fact, the assumption made by some people that "there will always be a need for (insert human job title)" is in my opinion quite…
"AI does not use images" and yet above we have near-exact (down to the individual loose hairs hanging down over her forehead) recreations of that famous National Geographic photo down to most details. So how does that happen, if it "doesn't use images"? — images are data; if data is used, the image is used. That's a false…