sharpening mip-map levels
polycounter lvl 17
sharpening up the mips in a DDS manually in photoshop to counter terrain shading blurriness
personnally i disagree with this, i find it makes any tiling issues much worse and really just ups the contrast in the mips not really makes any difference to the sharpeness of the image, also makes any aliasing issues much worse.
but has anyone got any tips tricks or examples of it working really well?
personnally i disagree with this, i find it makes any tiling issues much worse and really just ups the contrast in the mips not really makes any difference to the sharpeness of the image, also makes any aliasing issues much worse.
but has anyone got any tips tricks or examples of it working really well?
Replies
Thing is, to be able to edit a mipmap. you must export your texture to DDS. Open the DDS, edit the mipmaps, and export again. (right?)
But this sucks because the DDS will have double compression. Unless there's some lossless DDS export option that I don't know of.
It can actually be useful on some things. For example on characters, I'll sometimes adjust contrast on the faces, to help them read better at a distance. You can also remove overlays for the 2nd mipmap and below for more readable textures.
On the latest engine I'm working on, without going too much into detail, we do some fancy blending from one set of terrain textures to the next. The particular blending kind of reduces contrast once it comes in, and it only comes in at a certain mip level, so I can over contrast that one to rectify.
But it's rare that I do that.
There is.
http://tesnexus.com/downloads/file.php?id=11817
there's a brief rundown of the types halfway down the description page.
On the other hand, I occasionally will open up a texture and futz with the alpha in the mips, so that it will fade in/out according to distance.
I would also love to have an easy way to simplify shapes on textures in the distance. Check out this painting:
The closest tree has 5 or 6 colors in the foliage. The farthest ones have only 1 or 2. That is something you could maybe simulate by hand painting the mips in a texture, but it would be a pain in the ass. Having a tool that could slot textures into various mips and allow easy editing would be better.
The benefit is that you still have crisp shapes in the distance, just at the proper granularity. Scaled-down mip maps just give you muddy over-detail.
As for editing mip levels to get transparency to work, I prefer an engine-side solution - for transparency problems with alpha test, you can set the "cutoff" point to something really high in your material settings (eg. default 0.5 is mid grey cutoff, 0.9 means close to white, etc), and then have a gradient from white to black instead of just a hard black/white edge in your alpha. That way when it mips down, the filtering retains more volume in the alpha, so for stuff like chain link fences it works really well - you don't end up with a flickering pixelly mess at a distance.
Our engine also had per-texture settings for "minimum mip level" so you could tell an alpha texture never to use below, say, mip 2 if that meant it looked better. Useful to have options like this available to the artist.
The more "procedural" stuff like this I reckon is always better - as soon as you are hand-editing anything then you're not only making more work for yourself right now, but also potentially more later if you ever have to revisit that texture. Something I'd always avoid if at all possible.
manipulating mipmaps is a thing i experienced in some productions, the best approach was to use them to increse certain details over distance and remove smal details, so in an RTS Title is removed fine sand structures but added some rougher shapes of dunes and such things, which worked pretty cool
Edit: oh, and sharpening alphas in the mips, or (if it's a simple shape, like a grid) just painting a new one, or getting rid of it altogether.