I've done several art tests at this point that were followed by rejections afterwards. So far all of these have been unpayed ones. I don't know about you but for me these tests tend to be time-consumi


I don't think he has a contract to actually sign for his art test.

again if they know that I had posted my art test.

but actually many companies don't want their art tests to be shared so that they can re-use them and have something to compare to. No point in comparing how someone does a new assignment if the assig

For a test like this I would expect some manner of compensation, the very least I'll definitely want to add the piece in my portfolio.

especially the first one. I've had a string of art tests issued to me since the start of the new year and ALL the relevant companies have subsequently rejected my applications. For most of these, eit


I've personally never had an art test that was limited to recruitment, I mean during the process I wouldn't show it, but after I would.

more leverage and many are not willing to pay artists for tests, so unless you have a lot of experience or some exceptional skills they simply can't find elsewhere your bargaining power is limited.

i'd just tell them that if it's not paid you won't have time to do it, but then i am not struggling to pay rent. I would consider it a good litmus test that if employer acts offended over you requirin

Would it hurt just to ask if it's going to be a payed or unpayed test then? Maybe it'll open up the conversation to the possibility? I dunno...