Home General Discussion

copyrights question...

polycounter lvl 14
Offline / Send Message
Belias polycounter lvl 14
Hi

I want to know how far should I edit my inspired source so that I avoid copyright issues....

mons.jpg

I think this is not enough.. [mid eye removal, no tie, darker, eye halos, fangs]
or this is enough?

zeel_r2.jpg

please give me any guidelines or tips... thanks.

Replies

  • gilesruscoe
    Offline / Send Message
    gilesruscoe polycounter lvl 10
    why not try to make your own original character instead of modifying an existing design?
  • Belias
    Offline / Send Message
    Belias polycounter lvl 14
    why not try to make your own original character instead of modifying an existing design?
    emmm, I will give it a try, but I still need an answer for the above Question.
  • greevar
    Offline / Send Message
    greevar polycounter lvl 6
  • Alberto Rdrgz
    Offline / Send Message
    Alberto Rdrgz polycounter lvl 9
    Dood, don't ever take that much subject matter from a single source. You're crippling yourself, artistically. Go on your own and develop your own ideas or some sort of something that flexes your art muscles. Make Art by getting your fingers dirty not rearranging someone else's work... :(
  • Andreas
    Offline / Send Message
    Andreas polycounter lvl 11
    Belias wrote: »
    emmm, I will give it a try, but I still need an answer for the above Question.

    You're going to jail, because you made a thread admitting you stole someones design.:poly124: (Does that constitute I.P. theft?)

    Seriously, you must have eaten lead paint at some point in your childhood!
  • Ghostscape
    Offline / Send Message
    Ghostscape polycounter lvl 13
    greevar wrote: »
    originality1.jpg

    Enough said.

    This picture is amazing, please tell me it is from an actual comic
  • Ace-Angel
    Offline / Send Message
    Ace-Angel polycounter lvl 12
    Andreas wrote: »
    You're going to jail, because you made a thread admitting you stole someones design.:poly124: (Does that constitute I.P. theft?)

    Seriously, you must have eaten lead paint at some point in your childhood!

    I didn't ready any of the original posts from Belias, but do like me, just put him on ignore. Will save alot of diddle-daddle questions which could be answered through simple logic.
  • Andreas
    Offline / Send Message
    Andreas polycounter lvl 11
    Its moronic, but invariably hilarious! I recommend reading at least his OP.
  • Two Listen
    Offline / Send Message
    Two Listen polycount sponsor
    Belias gets more points than some of you simply for continuing to post in spite of people being douchebags whenever he asks a question.

    To Belias: The original design wasn't anything complex to begin with, but I'd take Alberto's advice to heart even still.
  • Andreas
    Offline / Send Message
    Andreas polycounter lvl 11
    Two Listen wrote: »
    Belias gets more points than some of you simply for continuing to post in spite of people being douchebags whenever he asks a question.

    No, not really.

    Does he get points for being a rip-off artist too?

    You don't 'give points' to a fly that repeatedly throws itself at a window, thinking something is going to be different next time. Unless you are worryingly sentimental. It just does it because its not very smart.

    I don't get why the one or two people who always whiteknight him on these boards do so.
  • greevar
    Offline / Send Message
    greevar polycounter lvl 6
    Andreas wrote: »
    Does he get points for being a rip-off artist too?

    A bit of an extreme viewpoint, don't you think? Everything comes from what came before. What Belias is doing is no different. He's really limiting himself, but calling him a rip-off just because it looks similar is hardly fair. Led Zepplin is probably considered the greatest rock band of all time and a lot of their music is practically wholesale copies of other artists. I'd wager that the creator of the monster in the reference was created borrowing ideas from other works. Don't be a hypocrite.
  • Andreas
    Offline / Send Message
    Andreas polycounter lvl 11
    Of course Zeppelin are rip-off artists. Good ones, but does that make it fine?

    What you are confusing there is incidental and intentional ripping. It doesn't just happen to 'look similar', Belias has openly admitted to ripping the design, intentionally changing details to avoid trouble, and has asked AN ART COMMUNITY to further help in this!!

    I'm sure the original artist intended to make something that wouldn't look too out of place in Monsters, Inc., but it is still a unique design of his. I'm also not sure how my post makes me a hypocrite, though I am; and most of us are, in at least one aspect of our character.
  • Stinger88
    Offline / Send Message
    Stinger88 polycounter
    People get points here! How did I not know nothing about this? I want points...

    Belias. Depending on what its for. You could say its a parody of the original character, that gets you out of any copywrite infringement, but it does need to be parody, don't just say it is. I would recommend doing your own original art though.
  • greevar
    Offline / Send Message
    greevar polycounter lvl 6
    Andreas wrote: »
    Of course Zeppelin are rip-off artists. Good ones, but does that make it fine?

    What you are confusing there is incidental and intentional ripping. It doesn't just happen to 'look similar', Belias has openly admitted to ripping the design, intentionally changing details to avoid trouble, and has asked AN ART COMMUNITY to further help in this!!

    I'm sure the original artist intended to make something that wouldn't look too out of place in Monsters, Inc., but it is still a unique design of his. I'm also not sure how my post makes me a hypocrite, though I am; and most of us are, in at least one aspect of our character.

    I'm not confusing anything. You're accusing him of asking for advice on intentional plagiarism, when he's just trying to get advice on making what he has more original. The two works differ enough already that one could guess that they took inspiration from similar sources. The silhouette is different, it has fangs, different coloring, different skin speckle pattern, different number of eyes, and so on. He's trying to make it his own and you're lambasting him for it. In his effort to avoid copyright issues, he's clearly created something new and different than the source material. It may look derivative, but would you have known that had he posted the source? They may be similar, but that doesn't mean it's a rip-off and he doesn't deserve the attitude for it.

    Anyway, back on topic:

    Belias, given the discussion, I'd recommend you add and modify more of the features of the creature to make it look less derivative. Adding horns, spines, or making the eyes asymmetrical might help.
  • pior
    Offline / Send Message
    pior grand marshal polycounter
    Belias, do you realize that what you are doing is borderline insulting to the original artist ? And that you are asking advice about the whole thing in an art community ?
  • Bibendum
    Man shit has gotten hostile here lately
  • greevar
    Offline / Send Message
    greevar polycounter lvl 6
    pior wrote: »
    Belias, do you realize that what you are doing is borderline insulting to the original artist ? And that you are asking advice about the whole thing in an art community ?

    Any artist that is insulted by someone emulating them is a petty person indeed. Nobody owns the idea of a green gum-drop shaped monster.
  • Zipfinator
    Offline / Send Message
    Zipfinator polycounter lvl 9
    greevar wrote: »
    Any artist that is insulted by someone emulating them is a petty person indeed. Nobody owns the idea of a green gum-drop shaped monster.

    Of course no one owns the idea on a green gum-drop shaped monster. It would be fine if Belias had used that as a source of inspiration or created his own creature like that from his imagination. It's the way that he asks "Is it okay if I just add teeth, remove the tie and remove one eye from that creature?" that's somewhat offensive.
  • rooster
    Offline / Send Message
    rooster mod
    I would feel honoured if I made something that inspired someone else. But 'inspiration' implies the original being a springboard for a new creation rather than something to straight up copy and then make a few cosmetic changes to avoid trouble.

    the latter is a far less appealing prospect than the former
  • pior
    Offline / Send Message
    pior grand marshal polycounter
    Exactly. "Inspiration" is totally different from "hey what do i need to change in order to not be sued". The first one is a respectful artistic approach. The second one is closer to greed and cold calculation. I mean ... isn't this obvious common sense? There is no point sugar coating or white knighting stuff like that. Sometimes it's good to go straight to the point and call BS ... BS.
  • greevar
    Offline / Send Message
    greevar polycounter lvl 6
    Zipfinator wrote: »
    Of course no one owns the idea on a green gum-drop shaped monster. It would be fine if Belias had used that as a source of inspiration or created his own creature like that from his imagination. It's the way that he asks "Is it okay if I just add teeth, remove the tie and remove one eye from that creature?" that's somewhat offensive.

    That's not even the case. He took the overall idea of the creature, created a new one from scratch with different features. As I said in my earlier post:
    The two works differ enough already that one could guess that they took inspiration from similar sources. The silhouette is different, it has fangs, different coloring, different skin speckle pattern, different number of eyes, and so on. He's trying to make it his own and you're lambasting him for it. In his effort to avoid copyright issues, he's clearly created something new and different than the source material. It may look derivative, but would you have known that had he posted the source?
    And how is it offensive? Exactly what harm has he done? The works are clearly different despite being similar. It's not a copy. It's an entirely new work using the same ideas expressed by the previous artist, which whom probably got their ideas the same way. You guys just go after him half-cocked and you don't even realize how completely wrong you are. You apparently have no idea how much art and culture is "ripped-off" from stuff that came before it.
    Exactly. "Inspiration" is totally different from "hey what do i need to change in order to not be sued". The first one is a respectful artistic approach. The second one is closer to greed and cold calculation. I mean ... Isnt this obvious ?
    No it isn't. This is just a knee-jerk reaction to seeing someone create a derivative work based on the work of another. Had he not posted the source and instead asked for critiques on it, you'd have not gone on the offensive. The only thing that's different is your idea of inspiration only exists in your mind.

    Belias has created a new and unique work. It bear similar ideas in its expression compared to the other, but they are not 1:1 copies. He has done nothing wrong, it is not offensive in any way, and it's not a rip-off.

    Good grief, let's just attack people who make fire hydrants for making them similar to other hydrant makers out there. I mean, how insulting that they make something similar! Do they have no respect?!?

    Edit:

    Case in point:

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcvd5JZkUXY"]All Creative Work Is Derivative - YouTube[/ame]
  • pior
    Offline / Send Message
    pior grand marshal polycounter
    Well, it's very saddening to see that you don't get it. Maybe it will come with time.
  • low odor
    Offline / Send Message
    low odor polycounter lvl 17
    but how is that relavent to copyright?







    1262642-trollface_tiny.jpg
  • Zipfinator
    Offline / Send Message
    Zipfinator polycounter lvl 9
    It looks like you're ignoring Belias' original post Greevar. You honestly don't see anything wrong with this?
    Belias wrote: »
    I want to know how far should I edit my inspired source so that I avoid copyright issues....

    I think this is not enough.. [mid eye removal, no tie, darker, eye halos, fangs]
    or this is enough?

    He makes it seem like he just took that other persons creature and started adding or subtracting from it until it's different enough to avoid copyright issues. You really think that's an acceptable way for an artist to work?
  • Two Listen
    Offline / Send Message
    Two Listen polycount sponsor
    pior wrote: »
    There is no point sugar coating or white knighting stuff like that. Sometimes it's good to go straight to the point and call BS ... BS.

    I agree. My post wasn't sparked by Belias, just people being douchebags for the sake of being douchebags. Seriously, it seems like it's become a thing lately to pop your collars and act like a total fuckwit anytime someone does something as simple as post a duplicate topic due to using the wrong search terms. It's one thing to say "Belias, you shouldn't do that, do something more original - you'll be better for it on multiple fronts" and another to say "LOL I blocked Belias he's such a stupid paint-eating kid".

    One is productive and takes the direction of steering someone in the right direction, the other is tripe.
  • greevar
    Offline / Send Message
    greevar polycounter lvl 6
    pior wrote: »
    Well, it's very saddening to see that you don't get it. Maybe it will come with time.

    I get it just fine, you don't get it. You're completely lost. You think you know how it all works, but you don't have a clue and now you're just sticking your fingers in your ears. All art is derivative. Everything is built upon what came before. Belias has committed no offense in doing what human kind has been doing since we smeared mud on cave walls. Everything is a copy of everything else. Nobody can create without ideas from other things to draw on. That's what Belias has done. He incorporated ideas from somewhere else and created a new work.
    He makes it seem like he just took that other persons creature and started adding or subtracting from it until it's different enough to avoid copyright issues. You really think that's an acceptable way for an artist to work?
    So you're interpreting his intent, judging him on that basis, assuming the worst of him, and ignoring that fact that he created something entirely new based on the same ideas? How small-minded!

    I think it's perfectly acceptable. So long as he's not making a 1:1 copy (i.e. downloading the asset) and doing zero work of his own, which is not the case. He took ideas from the other artist and remixed them into his own original work that started from nothing but ideas. You guys are being ass-hats because he brought copyright into it and ignorantly assumed that his intent is malicious.

    You're being absurdly over-protective of ideas like they're something exclusive to only the person that conceived them. There are paid professionals in the entertainment industry (like Disney, Universal, etc.) who do the same exact thing and nobody assaults them with accusations of offending the artist that they got their ideas from. He didn't do anything in creating this creature that any of you couldn't be accused of, you just don't know you've "ripped-off" someone's work.

    I think some artists around here have an over-inflated sense of self importance that is not congruent with reality. Your work is not a sacred object to be revered and it's not an act of blasphemy to use inherent ideas from it to create something similar. It's a statement of your thoughts that communicate your ideas to others through visual medium. The point of which is to propagate those ideas to others so they can further spread them through expressions of their own interpretations, which Belias did.

    You're so caught up in your elitism and ownership culture that you've forgotten that art is communication at its core and thus it's purpose is to spread ideas. So you accuse and attack Belias for doing exactly what art was intended to do because you care more about protecting the artist at the expense of freedom of expression. What you're doing is highly oppressive.
  • EarthQuake
    Nice spaz out bro.
  • Ghostscape
    Offline / Send Message
    Ghostscape polycounter lvl 13
    I'm going to serious business this for a second here.

    Belias, there isn't a hard definition of what is/isn't copyright infringement. It's ultimately up to the judge presiding over a court case, if this ever went to court. Ultimately it's up to that judge to decide whether your artwork is an original piece or an infringing derivative.

    The fact that you are intentionally attempting to alter someone else's work until you feel it is no longer recognizable, rather than building from the ground up, means both A) you've communicated intent to intentionally derive work from them as directly as possible, and B) since you aren't rebuilding conceptually from the ground up, the derivation is going to be much more obvious and direct, thus decreasing your chances of defending it conceptually.

    In short, you're doing it wrong.
  • Snacuum
    Offline / Send Message
    Snacuum polycounter lvl 9
    I agree with Greevar on this one, even though I also support most of you in telling Belias that he should work on something more wholly of his own creation.

    As far as I'm concerned I see nothing wrong with what Belias is doing down to even imitating it ad-verbatim, AS LONG AS he credits and acknowledges the original creator and copyright holder with all published versions of this work (and it's even recommended to contact the original creator to seek a form of permission to create a derivative and/or parody work.) I see what he's brought up here as just being careful, YES HE SHOULD MAKE SOMETHING ORIGINAL, but in the efforts of improving his skills and understanding workflow he could also create a recognisable copy of another asset, something that many junior artists are tasked to do, even though the assets may be in house. So if he wanted to do that then he just wants to know, how far he should change it to make sure that even though it's clearly derivative, that the creators would not get uppity and shut him down because "your blob looks similar to my blob."

    Hell how much does this already happen here? There was a competition to create your own version of an actual fighting game character recently, and there's even a Dirty Harry in the banner. Yes, before everybody flames me, they're all original 'interpretations' but they're still recognisable constructs of the originals, leaving most of the artists here to cover themselves with a disclaimer stating that the original work of inspiration belongs to somebody else.

    Of course this is my view of the issue, but for Belias sake, and surely the sake of everyone else here that's been put in huff, I'll impart this bit of wisdom I once read on -- http://www.sloperama.com/advice/faq61.htm --

    READ IT BELIAS

    [SIZE=+1] If you ever have to ask "will this get me in trouble," and you don't want to pay an attorney to find out, you shouldn't do it. Simple. Remember-- Just because you might have a DEFENSE doesn't mean you can't get SUED. [/SIZE]
  • pior
    Offline / Send Message
    pior grand marshal polycounter
    But that's the thing G - I totally understand the legalese behind all this, no need to walltext us.

    What I am saying is that you might get a better grip on the other layers of implication this has (that is to say : the common sense behavior amongst respectful art communities) with a bit more time and experience within that field. And again - it comes with time and experience, and that's okay. Just don't assume you know how it all works. If anything, the advice given to B is not only legal, it's also ethical. The DVD he is doing to teach people realtime art might be frowned upon if people get to know of his attitude of ripping stuff up "just enough", most likely without the author consent. "Oh, thats the DVD from the guy who ripped off that tiny green monster thing!" is what most people could think. Our advice is for him to simply not do that, as it isn't a wise way to go at things.

    Meanwhile it might be wise to read further and understand what other artists have to say on the subject. And, mind you, no one has over inflated egos here, quite the opposite actually. Experience brings a great deal of open-mindedness and humility.
  • greevar
    Offline / Send Message
    greevar polycounter lvl 6
    I think Belias would do himself a service by drawing ideas from more than one source, but it doesn't make what he's doing wrong. It's plainly a new work that is merely similar, not a copy as many are complaining.

    I also don't think it's disrespectful to the artist either. Those ideas aren't exclusive nor rivalrous, he didn't come up with them in a creative vacuum. The other artist owes as much credit to the public domain of works for his ideas as Belias.

    I know I tend to go text-wall on people when I get frazzled. I have ADHD and it's hard to organize my thoughts at times, so the dam breaks and all of my thoughts end up on the page in a Jackson Pollock fashion.
  • eld
    Offline / Send Message
    eld polycounter lvl 18
    greevar wrote: »
    I think Belias would do himself a service by drawing ideas from more than one source, but it doesn't make what he's doing wrong.

    He clearly asks how close you can go copying something without getting legally in trouble.
    Someone here probably works at gameloft and knows the answer? ;)


    The other small fun fact, as with always with a thread by belias it involves a piece of art by him he made years ago.
  • Andreas
    Offline / Send Message
    Andreas polycounter lvl 11
    greevar wrote: »
    I'm not confusing anything. You're accusing him of asking for advice on intentional plagiarism, when he's just trying to get advice on making what he has more original.

    No, he is pretty much doing what I am accusing him of.

    Two Listen wrote: »
    being douchebags for the sake of being douchebags.

    I don't see anyone here that fits that description. I don't sugarcoat it, but it is a very valid point. He's bordeline stealing, for gods sake.


    I'm not even going to address any of Greevar's latest page filling outbursts, he's a funny dude but boy are his ideals and definitions screwed up! :D
  • conte
    Offline / Send Message
    conte polycounter lvl 18
    Belias surely knows how to start discussion threads, hahah.
  • rolfness
    Offline / Send Message
    rolfness polycounter lvl 18
    eld wrote: »
    He clearly asks how close you can go copying something without getting legally in trouble.
    Someone here probably works at gameloft and knows the answer? ;)


    The other small fun fact, as with always with a thread by belias it involves a piece of art by him he made years ago.


    THIS

    and actually its a pertinent point in many industries.. how close can you get without getting your ass sued off
  • [HP]
    Offline / Send Message
    [HP] polycounter lvl 13
    lol I love how some people don't get how Belias is just a troll, probably a double account.
  • mdeforge
    Offline / Send Message
    mdeforge polycounter lvl 14
    Exactly. "Inspiration" is totally different from "hey what do i need to change in order to not be sued".
    Well how else do you propose he ask it? It's a legit question. When making art, which is derivative, you have to be careful no matter how you approach it. I understand how you saw this question as a fundamental flaw in how he's approaching the creative process, but this all could have been turned into a much more interesting discussion than it was (edit: or started out to be. It did turn into a thread with information I found useful. Big nod to Snacuum).
  • greevar
    Offline / Send Message
    greevar polycounter lvl 6
    Snacuum wrote: »
    YES HE SHOULD MAKE SOMETHING ORIGINAL

    Define "original".

    Edit: I say this to no one in particular, but everyone equally.

    At what point is something original? How can you be original when everything is built on everything else? Originality is merely an arbitrary concept, nobody has the authority to make the judgement on what's original, yet many do and they take great offense when this ambiguous rule is breached. It's like judging someone by a secret set of rules that only you know and then get upset when someone violates them. Many here speak of respecting the artist and say that Belias dealt this artist a great offense, but what about the sources that artist has drawn from? Is he any more above reproach even though he's also using what others have done to create his art? Is it only when we openly admit that we did something that we're all guilty of that we commit this most heinous of crimes to art?
  • Justin Meisse
    Offline / Send Message
    Justin Meisse polycounter lvl 18
    If you have to ask "how much should I change this to not violate copyright" you are being unoriginal.

    Give originality a try, as you can see by this thread; it's actually more work to try and copy someone else.
  • greevar
    Offline / Send Message
    greevar polycounter lvl 6
    If you have to ask "how much should I change this to not violate copyright" you are being unoriginal.

    Give originality a try, as you can see by this thread; it's actually more work to try and copy someone else.

    That's a pretty weak metric to measure by and an arbitrary one at that. Copyright does not set the bar on what's original or not, it's an amorphous and enigmatic concept at best. It's impossible to define a bright-line rule on it. Originality is about as concrete as what is beautiful. No two minds can come to the same conclusion on every instance.

    What you're saying really means, "Don't compete with me on my own ideas, you might do it better than me and I can't have that." That, I think, is where the "offense" comes from. Somebody using the same ideas you used in another work that bears similarity is a threat to the exclusivity of your ideas. You want control and it pisses you off that someone took that power away from you, which is so easy to do (taking your ideas, not piss you off. Although that might be easy to do as well. I can't say for certain.).
  • greevar
    Offline / Send Message
    greevar polycounter lvl 6
    eld wrote: »
    He clearly asks how close you can go copying something without getting legally in trouble.
    Someone here probably works at gameloft and knows the answer? ;)


    The other small fun fact, as with always with a thread by belias it involves a piece of art by him he made years ago.

    Which you automatically take as him "side-stepping" or "cheating" copyright, when in fact he's trying to take another person's ideas and remix them into something new, but similar. He liked what the artist did and he wanted to create his own interpretation. Is that so wrong?
  • mdeforge
    Offline / Send Message
    mdeforge polycounter lvl 14
    If you have to ask "how much should I change this to not violate copyright" you are being unoriginal.

    Even while being original you need to be aware of what is out there. If I decide to create a sci-fi mustached space plumber in a red jumpsuit that uses a flame thrower to clean out the alien invested drains, is that original or unoriginal?

    If mario came to your mind at all during that paragraph, then the gray area here is worth talking about and not just dismissed.
  • Alberto Rdrgz
    Offline / Send Message
    Alberto Rdrgz polycounter lvl 9
    IF belias is a troll....

    To BELIAS for all his hard work and dedication!


    Golden-Troll-Award.jpg
  • Justin Meisse
    Offline / Send Message
    Justin Meisse polycounter lvl 18
    greevar wrote: »
    What you're saying really means, "Don't compete with me on my own ideas, you might do it better than me and I can't have that." That, I think, is where the "offense" comes from. Somebody using the same ideas you used in another work that bears similarity is a threat to the exclusivity of your ideas. You want control and it pisses you off that someone took that power away from you, which is so easy to do (taking your ideas, not piss you off. Although that might be easy to do as well. I can't say for certain.).

    Where the FUCK do you get off putting words in my mouth?

    Ideas are cheap and easy - copying someone else is just a crutch and trying to change it enough to avoid getting sued is just putting in work and effort that would best be spent more into creating your own thing.
  • greevar
    Offline / Send Message
    greevar polycounter lvl 6
    Where the FUCK do you get off putting words in my mouth?

    Ideas are cheap and easy - copying someone else is just a crutch and trying to change it enough to avoid getting sued is just putting in work and effort that would best be spent more into creating your own thing.

    Ideas are cheap, they're also not anybody's property and certainly nobody has the right to say others can't use them. As for the rest, that's merely your opinion, not fact.

    You need to calm down. I wasn't putting words in your mouth so much as giving voice to the attitude people take over what is allowed when using ideas. Your strong emotional response indicates that I've clearly struck a nerve which tells me I'm on to something.

    I think people have turned copying into a dirty word that elicits some serious control issues and cognitive dissonance. I hate to break it to everyone whom disagrees, but copying is how we do everything. Without copying, there would be not art, no science, no knowledge, and no civilization. It's a fundamental part of learning and creation. You're going to have to accept that it's not only okay to copy, but actually a good thing because humans don't copy things verbatim, we actually transform it in the process of copying. Only machines make perfect unaltered copies because they lack the capacity to create. When someone copies, they transform it, if only marginally, which cascades throughout society. Have you ever played "telephone" as a child. Case in point.

    Too many people are invested in their art as a means to an end (or a product) rather than the communication it really is.
  • Jeremy Wright
    Offline / Send Message
    Jeremy Wright polycounter lvl 17
    This thread is a river of piss, and Greevar is the ferryman.
  • low odor
    Offline / Send Message
    low odor polycounter lvl 17
    yep..same Bullshit..different thread
  • r_fletch_r
    Offline / Send Message
    r_fletch_r polycounter lvl 9
    This is going nowhere fast
This discussion has been closed.